목차
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Research object and
methods
3. News analysis
1) News coverage in China
2) News coverage in
international news agencies
3) News coverage in Korea
4. Result of
analysis
5. Conclusion
본문
2)News coverage in international news
agencies
Covering the troubled situations between Google and China, most of
news agencies, even Aljazeera, take a biased attitude toward Google. It is
because ‘Free flow of information’ ideology was practically accepted to most
part of the world after the Cold War, capitalism and democracy winning.
Nowadays, freedom of speech is naturally needed to healthy country, so China is
facing all these nations’ blaming that China restricts the rights of Chinese
people. Google, the famous search engine website over the world, is trying to
advance to the mainland of China since 2000. In first time, China Government
avoided the coming of other countries’ internet companies, because it was afraid
of their business’ policy can be dangerous to its centralization of power. It
demanded the companies to keep its National Security Law. Google had to follow
the law to start its business. Recent years Google is raising the standard of
rebellion, at the same time, China is also fighting Google pressing its
beneficial foundation. Most of the opinions are represented by the view of
U.S.A. International agencies showed a tendency to protect Google’s standpoint.
They generally describe Google as an agent of justice and China as a dictator.
An article named ‘What Happens as Google Uncensors Search in China?’ by the
New York Times included interviews of Chinese internet users showed an opinion
for justification of Google’s withdrawal in China. The interviewees are almost
university students and they welcomed Google’s movement because of free
accessibility to learn and get any information they want. These interviews tried
to send the idea that the tendency in China is every netizens support Google
totally. The report also called the case ‘One-sided censorship of China’ by
quoting the interviewees’ statements. By showing Chinese people’s real thoughts,
the article looks objective surely.
The New York Times pressed another
article ‘Google, Citing Attack, Threatens to Exit China’. The report confirms
that hacking on G-mail was China’s doing in spite of official denial of China.
It mentioned the Google’s motto ‘Don’t be evil’ to show that Google’s withdrawal
is for justice and freedom. Also, the writer kept pointing out the reality that
how the censorship blocks the information and human rights in China which is
against the world trends.
As well as the News from CNN was not different at
all. They tend to use hostile expressions like ‘Struggle with China’, or
‘Threatens to exit’ in the news reports. ‘Google Threatens to Exit China’
covered Google keep its belief although it may lose its financial profit, and
comment one-sided china’s view shortly.
3)News coverage in
Korea
Korean media maintain their objectivities covering the news of each
side. Commonly, the Korean media reported both different attitudes of China
insisting no company can be an exception of National Security Law, and U.S.A
insisting China Government should guarantee the freedom of sharing information.
In this case, Korean news agencies are holding a balance in general. Most news
of Korean broadcasts and newspapers were delivering more objectively than news
of U.S.A or China. Usually the coverage was founded on factual events, with
neutral stands. News of Korean media also
본문내용
n Case of Google in
China
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Research object and methods
3.
News analysis
1) News coverage in China
2) News coverage in international
news agencies
3) News coverage in Korea
4. Result of analysis
5.
Conclusion
Introduction
Google has made good on its threat to close its
China-based search service in response to state censorship and hacker
intrusions. On January 13, 2010,
참고문헌
Reference
1.
Blog.heritage.org
2. Internet should be free but regulated, CHINA DAILY,
2010-01-26
3. No absolute free flow of information, CHINA DAILY,
2010-01-26
4. Googles groundless accuses hurt global trust on Internet, CNTV,
2011-06-03
5. Chinese experts blast Google for politicizing trade rules,
Xinhua news, 2010-06-18
6. 中拒政治的谷歌谷歌的政治(China refused to” Political Google”),
Xinhua news. 2010-03-20
7. Blog of Dan Schiller,
http://danschiller.info/
8. Free Flow of Information and Profit? , Huffpost
Tech, 2011-03-04
9. Huffington Post: Google in China
timeline |
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기